Customs Valuation Appraisement Methodology: a Comparative Analysis of European and United States Governing Legislation
Loading...
Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Griffith College
Supervisor
Abstract
This research sets out to identify the customs duty appraisement methodology best
suited to modem international trade. The research identified the most effective method
from the position of reducing operational barriers to trade. The operational review
identified that the use of an appraisement methodology could be detrimental to trade
overall, acting as a barrier to trade facilitation and fueling internal competition. The
research also identified why traditional protectionist measures do more harm than good
to the domestic activity of the trade nation employing such measures.
Research methods employed as part of this study included a mix of qualitative and
quantitative research through industry research surveys focused on EU and US industry
professionals. Legislative analysis and practical observations from industry experience
were also considered within the research. The major findings of this research were that
the US has clearly founded legislation driving the use of a specific method of
appraisement aimed at ensuring equity and fairness amongst its member states. In
contrast, the European method creates internal competition through lack of appropriate
legislation, demographics and misalignment across tax law. Therefore, allowing
individual member states to implement programmes to promote locations as a point of
import, thus creating internal competition amongst member states. The main finding
was that alignment of legislation and practise between the two trade blocks would be
advantageous to trade facilitation overall.
This is a significant consideration, given that the centre of this research focused on
trade facilitation measures of the two largest trade nations in the world, as they look to
embark upon a trade facilitation agreement. There is no evidence available in the public
domain to show that this misalignment between processes and practices has been
considered, or how it will ultimately lead to disparity in trade practices. The limitations
of this research were that, because of its unique nature, very little information was
available on the financial impact of alignment. For this reason, further study is needed
in this area of duty appraisement alignment, together with any financial impact that this
may have on either trade block.