eprintid: 190 rev_number: 16 eprint_status: archive userid: 30 dir: disk0/00/00/01/90 datestamp: 2019-02-28 10:31:32 lastmod: 2019-02-28 10:31:32 status_changed: 2019-02-28 10:31:32 type: article metadata_visibility: show creators_name: Finnegan, Barry title: TTIP and CETA in Irish Newspapers: Expertise and Plurality of Editorial Bias. ispublished: pub subjects: HB subjects: HJ subjects: JN subjects: JX divisions: fac_eng full_text_status: public keywords: TTIP, CETA, Irish newspapers, editorial bias, neoliberalist bias abstract: This paper analyses Irish newspaper coverage of two international free-trade and investment-protection agreements, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (herein, TTIP) between the EU and the USA whose negotiations are currently in suspension, and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (herein, CETA) currently provisionally applied in law between the EU and Canada. The paper demonstrates that they constitute two good examples of substantive matters of public importance with which to analyse the editorial balance of Irish newspapers. Using agenda-setting and framing theory,the research sets out the importance of the role of media in democratic life, and contextualises newspapers’ editorial bias in Habermas’s concept of a transformed public sphere. Categorising them as editorially Pro-, Neutral or Anti-, the paper takes in all 199 articles and 39 letters on TTIP and CETA published in three national, Irish, daily, broadsheets, the Irish Times, the Irish Independent and the Irish Examiner since the start of their respective negotiations, and up to July 2017. Informed experts of different types are used in these articles to explain TTIP and CETA. 620 separate instances of the usage of experts are identified and these are categorised as being Pro,Anti or Cautious on TTIP and CETA. The research findings are that: (1) there is significant variation in editorial bias on TTIP and CETA among the three papers, and, (2) in four of the six cases, governmental and corporate experts’ voice is given privileged status to the detriment of all other actors’ voice including civil society organisations, academics and opposition politicians at a ratio of 2 to 1, up to 2.8 to 1. The differentiated readership of each paper is used to explain editorial differences; and the tentative suggestion is made, that the absence of a uniformly Pro-TTIP/CETA bias suggests a possible deconstructing of a dominant neoliberalist bias in Irish newspapers identified in previous literature. However, the dominance of governmental and corporate experts used to define the TTIP/CETA story somewhat tempers this suggestion. date: 2018 date_type: published publication: Irish Communications Review volume: 16 number: 1 publisher: Dublin Institute of Technology pagerange: 214-246 id_number: https://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=icr refereed: TRUE issn: 0791-0010 official_url: https://arrow.dit.ie/icr/ referencetext: ATTAC (Ireland) (2016) ‘ATTAC Ireland joins 280 European civil society organisations to reject ISDS in all EU trade deals’, ATTAC (Ireland). Available at: http://www.attac.ie/attac-ireland-joins-280-european-civil-societyorganisations-to-reject-isds-in-all-eu-trade-deals/ [05-01-18]. Bartels, 2017 ‘Human Rights, Labour Standards, and Environmental Standards in CETA’, in Griller, S., Obwexer, W., & Vranes, E. (eds), Mega-Regional Trade Agreements: CETA, TTIP, and TiSA: New Orientations for EU External Economic Relations. Pp: 202-215. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Birnbaum, D. (2016) ‘Have international trade agreements been good for your health?’, in International Journal of Health Governance, 21 (2), pp.47-50. DOI.org/10.1108/IJHG-03-2016-0015 Cawley, A. (2012) ‘Sharing the Pain or Shouldering the Burden? News-media framing of the public sector and the private sector in Ireland during the economic crisis, 2008–2010’ in Journalism Studies, Vol 13, Issue 4, 600-615. DOI:10.1080/1461670X.2011.629108 CEO (Corporate Europe Observatory) (2016) ‘TTIP: Civil society groups denounce new EU regulatory cooperation proposal’, March 21st. Available at: https://corporateeurope.org/pressreleases/2016/03/ttip-civil-society-groupsdenounce-new-eu-regulatory-cooperation-proposal [03-11-17]. Comhlámh (2017) ‘CETA: the Implications for Ireland – A Guide to Engaging your Public Representatives on the Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union’, Comhlámh Trade Justice Group. Available at: ttps://www.comhlamh.org/wpcontent/uploads/2017/07/Comhlamh_CETA_2017-publication.pdf [10-01-18]. Copenhagen Economics (2015) ‘TTIP Impact for Ireland (This report is prepared for the Irish Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation)’, February. Available at: https://www.copenhageneconomics.com/dyn/resources/Publication/publication PDF/5/15/1429776797/1888-01-ttip-impact-in-ireland-26feb2015_frontpage.pdf [03-11-17]. Couvreur, A. (2015) ‘New Generation Regional Trade Agreements and the Precautionary Principle: Focus on the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union’, in Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law, Vol. 15, 265-292. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/asperv15&div=12 &id=&page [10-01-18]. Croteau, D & Hoynes, W (2006) The Business of Media: Corporate Media & the Public Interest. London: Pine Forge Press. Crouch, C (2016) ‘The March Towards Post-Democracy, Ten Years On’, in The Political Quarterly, 87(1), January-March. DOI: 10.1111/1467-923X.12210 Davies, H. (2016). ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement and the Future of the Precautionary Principle’, in British Journal of American Legal Studies, 5(2), 449- 486. DOI:10.1515/bjals-2016-0016. Dolle, T. & Simões, B. G. (2016) ‘Mixed Feelings about ‘Mixed Agreements’ and CETA’s Provisional Application’, in, European Journal of Risk Regulation, Vol. 7, Issue 3, September. DOI.org/10.1017/S1867299X00006139 DRB, 2016. ‘Opinion on the Establishment of an Investment Tribunal in TTIP – the Proposal from the European Commission 16.09.2015 and 11.12.2015’, The German Magistrates Association. Available at: https://www.foeeurope.org/sites/default/files/euus_trade_deal/2016/english_version_deutsche_richterbund_opinion_ics_feb2016.pdf Original in German, available at: http://www.drb.de/fileadmin/docs/Stellungnahmen/2016/DRB_160201_Stn_Nr_04_Europaeisches_Investitionsgericht.pdf [03-11-17]. Entman R. M. (1993) ‘Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, in Journal of Communication, 43(4), December, 51-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Environmental Pillar (2017) ‘Press Release: Over 80 Irish civil society groups,including unions, farmers and business owners, are calling on MEPs to reject the EU Canada trade deal’, The Environmental Pillar – Working for a Sustainable Future. Available at: https://environmentalpillar.ie/press-release-over-80-irishcivil-society-groups-including-unions-farmers-and-business-owners-are-callingon-meps-to-reject-the-eu-canada-trade-deal/ [10-01-18]. Fox, E. & Rau, H. (2016) ‘Climate Change Communication in Ireland’ in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.459 Finnegan, B. (2016) ‘Is This How European Democracy Will Die? An Obscure Technocratic Vote During Euro 2016!’. ATTAC (Ireland) – the Association for the Taxation of financial Transactions for the Aid of Citizens, April 20th . Available at: http://www.attac.ie/is-this-how-european-democracy-will-die/ [03-11-17]. Finnegan, B. & Gold L (2016) ‘Trócaire/ATTAC Submission to the Joint Committee on Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation on TTIP’, January 27th . Available at: http://www.attac.ie/trocaire-attac-submission-to-the-joint-committee-on-jobsenterprise-and-innovation-on-ttip/ [03-11-17]. Goyens, M. (2015) ‘Regulatory cooperation: perhaps boring, but the TTIP storm on the horizon’. BEUC – The European Consumer Organisation, February 3rd. Available at: http://www.beuc.eu/blog/regulatory-cooperation-perhaps-boringbut-the-ttip-storm-on-the-horizon/ [03-11-17]. Habermas, J. (2009 [1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press. Henson, A (2015). ‘REACHing for Environmental and Economic Harmony: Can TTIP Negotiations Bridge the U.S.-EU Chemical Regulatory Gap, in, in, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 43, No. 3, 727-758. ICTU (2016) ‘NO DEAL: Why Unions Oppose TTIP & CETA: Briefing on the Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Canada-Europe Trade Agreement (CETA)’, Irish Congress of Trade Unions. Available at: https://www.ictu.ie/download/pdf/no_deal.pdf [29-01-18]. Irish Examiner (2014) ‘‘Enormous gulf’ in world trade talks as Europe refuses to buy GM food’, in The Irish Examiner, March 13, Thursday, SUPPLEMENTS (FARMING). Irish Examiner (2015) ‘What lies behind the new trade agreement’, in The Irish Examiner, January 3, Saturday, BUSINESS. Irish Independent (2016a) ‘EU and US talks teams still divided over TTIP terms’, in The Irish Independent, July 16, Saturday, NEWS, Pg. 31. Irish Independent (2016b) ‘Trade deals under pressure on all sides’, in The Irish Independent, September 27, Tuesday, FARMING, Pg. 16. Irish Times (2013) ‘Irish presidency leads effort to bridge transatlantic trade divide’, in The Irish Times, June 13, Thursday, WORLD, Pg. 13. Jones, B (2017) ‘Support for free trade agreements rebounds modestly, but wide partisan differences remain’, in Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World, Pew research Centre. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/facttank/2017/04/25/support-for-free-trade-agreements-rebounds-modestly-butwide-partisan-differences-remain/ [05-01-18]. Kellner D. (2014) ‘Habermas, the Public Sphere, and Democracy’, in Boros, D. & Glass, J.M. (eds), Re-Imagining Public Space. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Kim, S.H., Scheufele, D. A., & Shanahan, J. (2002) ‘Think About It This Way: Attribute Agenda-Setting Function Of The Press And The Public’s Evaluation Of A Local Issue’, in Journalism & Media Communications Quarterly, 79(1), Spring. DOI.org/10.1177/107769900207900102 Lynch, S (2016) ‘Road to free trade with Europe is paved with good intentions’, in The Irish Times, April 30, Saturday, FINANCE, Pg. 15. Mansfield, E. D. & Mutz, D. C. (2009) ‘Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety’ in International Organization, 63(3), pp 425-457. DOI:10.1017/S0020818309090158 Mark, Dr. J. (2016) ‘German Association of Judges on the TTIP Proposal of the European Commission’, in, Global Arbitration News, March 21st. Available at: https://globalarbitrationnews.com/german-association-judges-proposaleuropean-commission-introduction-investment-court-system-settle-investorstate-disputes-transatlantic-trade-investmen/ [03-11-17]. McCombs, M. E. & Shaw D.L (1972) ‘The Agenda-Setting Function Of Mass Media’, in, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), January. DOI.org/10.1086/267990 McCombs, M. E. (2005) ‘A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future’, in, Journalism Studies, 6(4). DOI.org/10.1080/14616700500250438 Meade, R. (2008) ‘Mayday! Mayday! Newspaper Framing Anti-Globalizers!: A Critical Analysis of the Irish Independent’s Anticipatory Coverage of the ‘Day of Welcomes’ Demonstrations’ in Journalism, Vol 9 (3), 330-352. DOI: 10.1177/1464884907089011 Mercille, J. (2014) ‘The Role of the Media in Sustaining Ireland’s Housing Bubble’ in New Political Economy, 19:2, 282-301, DOI:10.1080/13563467.2013.779652 Nichols, S. (2016) ‘Transnational Capital and the Transformation of the State: Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)’, in Critical Sociology, 1-21. DOI:10.1177/0896920516675205 Oxfam (2014) ‘Europe seeks to expand big pharma monopoly at expense of poor people, warn NGOs ahead of TTIP talks’, 29 September, Oxfam.Org. Available at: https://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2014-09-29/europe-seeksexpand-big-pharma-monopoly-expense-poor-people-warn [05-01-18] Petersmann, E.L. (2017). ‘ CETA, TTIP and TiSA: New Trends in International Economic Law’, in, Griller, S., Obwexer, W., & Vranes, E. (eds), Mega-Regional Trade Agreements: CETA, TTIP, and TiSA: New Orientations for EU External Economic Relations. Pp: 17-43. Oxford: Oxford University Press. PowerShift, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (and others) (2016) ‘Making Sense of CETA, 2nd Edition – An analysis of the final text of the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement’. Published by PowerShift, CCPA et al., Berlin/Ottawa. Available at: https://power-shift.de/making-sense-of-cetaen/ [29-01-18]. Phelan, S, (2007) ‘The Discourses Of Neoliberal Hegemony: The case of the Irish Republic’, in, Critical Discourse Studies, 4(1). DOI.org/10.1080/17405900601149459 Phelan, S. (2014) ‘Irish neoliberalism, media and the politics of discourse’, Chap. 5, in Neoliberalism, Media and the Political. Pp: 73-88. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. Power, M.J, Haynes A., & Devereux, E (2015) ‘Reasonable People v The Sinister Fringe: Interrogating the Framing of Ireland’s Water Charge Protestors through the Media Politics of Dissent’. Working Paper WP2015-01, March, University of Limerick, Department of Sociology Working Paper Series. Available at http://www.ul.ie/sociology/pubs/wp2015-01.pdf Pp:1 to 27. [29-01-18]. Riekmann, S. P. (2017) ‘The Struggle for and Against Globalisation: International Trade Agreements and the Democratic Question’ in Griller, S., Obwexer, W., & Vranes, E. (eds), Mega-Regional Trade Agreements: CETA, TTIP, and TiSA: New Orientations for EU External Economic Relations. Pp: 286-294. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Stop-TTIP (2015) ‘Stop TTIP is supported by an alliance of more than 500 civil society organisations and trade unions from all over Europe’, European Initiative Against TTIP And CETA. Available at: https://stop-ttip.org/supportingorganisations/ [29-01-18]. Strange, M. (2015) ‘Power in Global Trade Governance: Is the EU a Unitary Actor, a Tool for Dominance, or a Site of Contestation? GATS and the TTIPNegotiations’, in International Journal of Public Administration’, 38: 12, pp.884-894. DOI.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.982290 Swinnen, J & Francken, N. (2006). ‘Summits, Riots and Media Attention: The Political Economy of Information on Trade and Globalisation, in, The World Economy, 29(5), May, pages 637-654. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00804.x. Swinnen, J. F, M. & McCluskey, J., (2006). ‘Trade, Globalization, and the Media: An Introduction’, in The World Economy, 29(5), May, pages: 611-614. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00802.x. Titley, G. (2012) ‘Budgetjam! A communications intervention in the politicaleconomic crisis in Ireland’ in 14(2), 292-306. DOI: 10.1177/1464884912448917 UNCTD, 2015. ‘World Investment Report 2015 – Reforming International Investment Governance’, Division on Investment and Enterprise, United Nations Conference on Trade & Development. Geneva: United Nations. Available at: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2015_en.pdf (07-02-2016). Van Harten, G. (2016) ‘Key flaws in the European Commission’s proposals for foreign investor protection in TTIP’, in Research Paper No. 16; 12(4). Osgoode Hall Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, York University. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2692122 [03-11-17]. Van Harten, G. (2017) ‘The EU-Canada Joint Interpretive Declaration/Instrument on the CETA’, in, Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper No. 6; 13(2). Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2850281 [03-11-17]. citation: Finnegan, Barry (2018) TTIP and CETA in Irish Newspapers: Expertise and Plurality of Editorial Bias. Irish Communications Review, 16 (1). pp. 214-246. ISSN 0791-0010 document_url: http://go.griffith.ie/190/1/FINNEGAN%202018%20-%20TTIP%20and%20CETA%20in%20Irish%20Newspapers%20-%20Expertise%20%26%20Plurality%20of%20Editorial%20Bias.pdf